Support pure specialization patterns #109
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MackieLoeffel
force-pushed
the
msammler/ipm_pure
branch
from
349f18c to
a3fcede
Compare
Add support for pure specialization patterns `%h`. This subsumes the dedicated forall specialization parts of proof mode terms.
MackieLoeffel
force-pushed
the
msammler/ipm_pure
branch
from
a3fcede to
38f016e
Compare
Collaborator
|
Looks great. I suggest we merge this first and leave the syntax discussion for #99. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on #108
Add support for pure specialization patterns
%h. This subsumes the dedicated forall specialization parts of proof mode terms.TODO: decide which syntax to use for proof mode terms. This PR uses
$$, but this can / should be changed.